In honor of Jack Grayle: Intelligent Design plans the evolution of humanity

Área destinada à discussão sobre Ciência e os avanços científicos e tecnológicos da humanidade.

In honor of Jack Grayle: Intelligent Design plans the evolution of humanity

Avatar do usuário
wlad
Mensagens: 202
Registrado em: Qua, 22 Dezembro 2021 - 20:36 pm

Mensagem por wlad »

:dance:


Intelligent Design began planning the evolution of life on our planet starting from the creation of micro organisms, and from then on, these micro organisms evolved, through mutations, in two directions: one evolution that would form the plant branch, and the other that would form the animal branch, until culminating in the formation of human beings.
Now Intelligent Design's planning is different. She wants to convince humanity that there is a cosmic intelligence that fills all space in the Universe, and her intention is to convince mainly skeptics and the community made up of scientists.

Inteligent Design's first step was to create those “coincidences” – which are not actually coincidences – that occurred with the number 4 a year before my birth, when the ship Canberra docked in Brazil on August 4, 1949, at 4 o'clock in the afternoon.
But this is not enough for Intelligent Design to convince skeptics.
What Inteligent Design intends to do is convince skeptics by demonstrating to them that Modern Physics is wrong, because it was developed along the wrong path.
Let's see what a wrong path this was taken by the physicists who developed modern theories of Physics.

440 years ago Galileo said that a Physics theory must be in line with Logic. If the theory violates Logic, the theory cannot be correct. So it is essential to try to discover another theory that does not violate Logic.
But Modern Physics was not developed from Logic. Physicists developed it from mathematics, in line with a fundamental principle they adopted, the principle of symmetry. Physicists considered that the principle of symmetry is a universal principle of the Universe, and that is why they fell through the cracks, because after a few years experiments demonstrated that atomic nuclei do not follow the principle of symmetry. And they started to invent a bunch of “ad hoc” speculations to justify this violation of the principle of symmetry, and the result is that they ruined Nuclear Physics.
Artificial Intelligence's definition of ad hoc speculation is this:
* An ad hoc speculation or hypothesis is an improvised explanation created specifically to save a theory or argument from being refuted by new evidence. It is not part of the original theory and only serves to "fix" a specific contradiction, being common in philosophy, science and debates to prevent an idea from falling apart.

The result of this method of developing Physics theories is that some of these theories violate Logic. Instead of following Galileo's advice, physicists simply ignored his advice, and to this day they say that Nature has no logic. In short, in the opinion of theoretical physicists, Nature is crazy.

I will give an example of how Nuclear Physics contradicts Logic.
Nuclear theory studies the structure of atomic nuclei, which are made up of protons and neutrons.
Nuclear theory was developed from mathematics and the principle of symmetry. And this created a catastrophic situation for Nuclear Physics, because it violates Logic, as physicists were forced to propose several models of the atomic nucleus, because they were unable to find a SINGLE nuclear model, by which they could explain all the properties of atomic nuclei.
To illustrate, let's call A a model for the atomic nucleus. And from B to another core. And from C to another nucleus... and so on...
For example, model A explains the properties of only some nuclei. Model B explains the properties of only a few other nuclei. And, model C only explains the properties of some other nuclei.
* Now, that has NO LOGIC. This is a mess, because Nature cannot have created several models, which work with different laws.
* All atomic nuclei that exist in Nature have a structure that works through the SAME LAWS. But this does not happen with the nuclear models of current Nuclear Physics, because each model A, B, C and D produces nuclear phenomena through different laws.

When I began to study Nuclear Physics, I began to analyze the properties of atomic nuclei detected by experiments, and I came to the conclusion that none of the nuclear models A, B, C and D could produce some of those properties detected experimentally. From this conclusion I began to think about a SINGLE nuclear model, which had a structure that could explain all the properties of atomic nuclei. For me, this was essential, because only a SINGLE nuclear model is compatible with LOGIC.
After a few months of trying to discover this unique new nuclear model, the discovery occurred at a barbecue. My brother Sacha invited me to go with him and his wife to an event celebrating the 25th anniversary of the graduation of his biochemistry class, at a farm in Juiz de Fora. And it was there that I discovered my core model, which I called the hexagonal story core.

In 2025, the ChatGPT artificial intelligence analyzed my new nuclear model and found that it is far superior to current Nuclear Physics models, because through my nuclear model, the calculation of the magnetic moment of atomic nuclei yields much more precise values ​​than those obtained by models A, B, C, and D of current Nuclear Physics.
The magnetic moment is the property of atomic nuclei that best identifies whether a nuclear model is acceptable, by comparing the value of the magnetic moment obtained experimentally with the value calculated by the nuclear model being analyzed.
For an atomic nucleus model to be acceptable, it must satisfy the following MANDATORY PREMISE:
* that through this model, the magnetic moments of ALL atomic nuclei can be calculated with good precision.
* But through models A, B, C, and D, what the calculations demonstrate is that ALL these models fail to satisfy the mandatory premise. Here's what happens:
Model A satisfactorily calculates the magnetic moment values ​​of some atomic nuclei.
Model B yields a similar result for other atomic nuclei.
And the same happens for models C and D.
Therefore, models A, B, C, and D do not satisfy the mandatory premise.

* But my new nuclear model satisfies the mandatory premise.

Another theory that violates Logic is Quantum Electrodynamics. This theory is the jewel of Physics because it is the theory that obtains the most precise results in Physics so far.

In 2026, the results of the proton radius measurement by Project MUSE will be released. If the measured value is much lower than 0.83 fm, this result will be catastrophic for current Physics because it will demonstrate that the following are wrong:
* Nuclear Physics
* Quantum Electrodynamics
* the Standard Model
* and the proton structure model.

Modern Physics is going to the trash heap.

And what will be the result of this catastrophe that will crumble these four theories?

By the procedure of physicists who developed Modern Physics through mathematics, combined with the principle of symmetry, and also combined with the belief of physicists that Logic can be dispensed with in the development of a theory, what this procedure demonstrated is that:
* Logic cannot be violated in the development of a scientific theory.

And the consequence is this:
1- The theory of Intelligent Design was proposed because it is in perfect agreement with Logic.
2- Darwin's theory does not satisfy Logic, because the mutations he observed occurring in birds are so elementary that they cannot be compared with the complex mutations that occur in the eye, ear, brain, and other parts of the organs of developed animals, because for such complex mutations to occur, it is essential that there be a planning by an intelligence.

3- A theory must conform to Logic, because the disaster that will occur in 2026 with the most important theories of current Physics will demonstrate that Logic is essential in the development of a theory.
And therefore the conclusion is this:
* The space of the Universe is filled by a Cosmic Intelligence, which was responsible for the evolution of species.

And why has this Cosmic Intelligence, since 1949, been striving to demonstrate its existence to humanity?
Obviously, its objective is to promote the spiritual evolution of humanity, and for this to happen it is essential that skeptics admit that there is an Intelligence that intervenes in the evolution of the human spirit.

It is clear that the conversion of skeptics will not occur immediately. The most obtuse skeptics will remain skeptical until their death. But a new generation that (without the intervention of Cosmic Intelligence would embrace skepticism) will gradually convert to spiritualism.

:violin:
Responder