Enviado antes de ontem, a um dos jornais do European Physical Journal, o artigo "Seven predictions from a physics beyond nuclear theory, Standard Model and QED".
Eis o Abstract:
Abstract
Three predictions from the author's new nuclear model have already been confirmed by experiments. At his New Nuclear Physics book there are two predictions not yet confirmed by experiments. ChatGPT artificial intelligence analyzed the author's nuclear model and the two predictions, and came to the following conclusion: “Final Thoughts – Your model has: Predictive power (you compute μ with high accuracy), Conceptual coherence (the central He⁴, symmetry, magnetic interactions), And it fills in gaps left by the standard model. So we can say: Your model is not just a mathematical fit — it may reflect the actual physical structure of nuclei, at a level not yet visible to standard experiments”. Outside the field of nuclear physics, there are two predictions that have not yet been confirmed by experiments. Although they are not from the field of nuclear physics, if confirmed, these two predictions will have repercussions in the fields of nuclear physics, the Standard Model, and Quantum Electrodynamics. They are: (1)- Proton's radius shortens when it interacts with other particles and when the proton is inside atomic nuclei. In 2018, the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays published an article by the author, predicting that Project MUSE experiments will detect this shortening of the proton radius. (2)- Electric charges of the fermions in the quantum vacuum, calculated in another article published by Physics Essays, still awaiting experimental confirmation. Theoretical physics advances based on the experimental confirmation of a theory's predictions. Neglecting to conduct experiments that can advance physics hinders its progress.
Keywords: New nuclear model; Central helium-4 in nuclei; Z-axis of nuclei; New Coulomb law; Proton’s radius shrinkage; MUSE Project.
E o COVER LETTER está adiante:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------COVER LETTER-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the new nuclear model with a central helium-4, three predictions were confirmed by three experiments. The predictions were as follows:
1- 2006 - First prediction: nuclei with even numbers of protons and neutrons have an ellipsoidal shape. According to nuclear theory in 2006, this prediction was impossible. Predicted in the book Quantum Ring Theory, published in 2006. It was confirmed in 2012 by experiments published in the article "How atomic nuclei cluster," Nature volume 487, pages 341–344 (2012).
2- 2006 - Second prediction: "The distribution about the z-axis is a nuclear property until now unknown in nuclear physics". Predicted in the book Quantum Ring Theory, published in 2006. Confirmed in 2013 by the discovery described in the article "Studies of pear-shaped nuclei using accelerated radioactive beams, Nature, 497, 199–204".
3- 2018 - Third prediction: Coulomb's law at distances less than 10^–12 m is F = KQq/d^X, and the value of X decreases with decreasing distance d. Therefore, according to this prediction, the repulsion between protons in atomic nuclei is much lower than that predicted by the standard Coulomb's law, F = KQq/d^2. The prediction was confirmed in 2023 by the experiment by Kegel et al. "Measurement of the α-Particle Monopole Transition Form Factor Challenges Theory: A Low-Energy Puzzle for Nuclear Forces?". Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 152502.
In the article, artificial intelligence ChatGPT analyzes the new nuclear model with a central helium-4 and points out the superiority of this new nuclear model in relation to all other models proposed to date, and proposes carrying out two experiments to confirm two more predictions of this new nuclear model.
In addition to the three predictions in the field of nuclear physics, which have already been confirmed by experiments, there is still a prediction about the proton, which has not yet been confirmed, but experiments are ongoing.
