ScienceDirect: cold fusion: It’s not pathological science

Área destinada à discussão sobre Ciência e os avanços científicos e tecnológicos da humanidade.

ScienceDirect: cold fusion: It’s not pathological science

Avatar do usuário
wlad
Mensagens: 137
Registrado em: Qua, 22 Dezembro 2021 - 20:36 pm

Mensagem por wlad »

Preliminary survey on cold fusion: It’s not pathological science and may require revision of nuclear theory

Abstract

Since 1989 the announcement of “cold fusion” by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleishmann, “cold fusion” field has been surrounded by controversy. After three decades, this field is alive and has produced thousands of publications, most in dedicated periodic and conferences. This work aims at checking whether “cold fusion” fits in pathological science traits. For each type of experiment and year, this work counted the distinct research groups results (success or failure). Experimental results from many research groups suggest that nuclear reactions in solids are more complex than fusion (it is not only fusion) and that they need energy triggers like background radiation, meaning chemical configurations alone do not seem to generate nuclear reactions. Some types of experiments present rising trends (the field does not fit in pathological science model) and have potential to bring disruptive technologies. If confirmed, experimental results will require revisions of accepted nuclear models.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 5721008973
Responder